Lalit Garg
(The writer can be reached at lalitgarg11@gmail.com)
The issue of legal recognition for same-sex marriage has been a topic of hot discussion in Indian life for a long time. The Supreme Court has made a truly historic decision by refusing to recognise same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act. If seen, this decision by the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court is a victory for Indian culture, Indian traditions, life values, values, ideals, and Indianness. The Supreme Court has also refused to give same-sex couples the right to adopt children. The court’s decision not only reaffirms the sentiments and values of the Indian people but also warns the foreign forces who are conspiring to spoil the social and family character of India by blurring and hurting Indian values, culture, and ideals. Certainly, this commendable decision by the Supreme Court is a unique initiative to keep intact and strengthen India’s past marriage tradition and culture.
The Supreme Court has made it clear that it cannot make laws; it can only interpret them. It is the job of Parliament to make changes to the Special Marriage Act. Certainly, this comment by the Supreme Court is worth noting. Respected and learned judges have accepted that persons having homosexual or lesbian tendencies should be given the rights that they have as citizens, and they should also be given equal fundamental rights, like other citizens in the social sphere, but as far as their relations with each other are concerned, if it is a matter of marriage, then this matter should be looked into by the elected representatives of the people sitting in the Parliament. By the way, those who stood or still stand in favour of legalising same-sex marriage should understand that marriage has a deeper meaning in Hinduism. Marriage, also called marriage, is a social union between two people of opposite sex. Or a religiously recognised union that establishes rights and obligations between those people, as well as between them and any resulting in biological or adopted children and grandchildren.
Marriage is a very important practice or sociological institution in human society. It is the core of the smallest unit that makes up society—the family. It is also the main biological means of maintaining the continuity of the human species. Marriage is not just an opportunity to enjoy sexual pleasure but also a medium to carry forward the lineage. In Indian tradition and culture, through marriage, responsible tasks like maintaining physical relations, creating progeny, nurturing them properly, carrying forward the family tradition, and making the progeny useful citizens of society are also done. Whereas getting legal recognition for gay or lesbian marriages would mean attacking the ancient high and ideal values. It is not surprising that support for such traditions has increased among the general public as soon as they have entered the country like a storm from western countries; hence, in reality, there have been two types of perceptions regarding gay or lesbian marriages in the country. A large section of the country has been opposed to recognising it at the legal and socio-religious levels. That is also because such a free, unruly, and arbitrary lifestyle is not allowed anywhere in Indian society. Anyway, wherever it comes to making laws, there must be an expectation that culture and traditions should not be ignored. Yes, a few people may also be in favour of legalising gay or lesbian marriages.
Now the Supreme Court has handed down the issue to the Parliament, but the important question is whether the Parliament will take initiative in this direction and make such a law. Parliament should chart the way forward, considering Indian tradition and cultural values in a broader context. The current government’s stance on this question is hopeful because the government argues that gay or lesbian marriages cannot be recognised because husband and wife are defined biologically in the law. Accordingly, both of them also have legal rights. Legalising gay or lesbian marriages will create a lot of complications in issues related to adoption, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, etc. All statutory provisions relating to these matters are based on marriage between a man and a woman. The responsibility of taking a decision regarding legal recognition of this complex subject, which is entangled in ancient and modern thinking, now rests on the shoulders of the country’s legislature. It can be expected that before making any law on this subject, special care will be taken of public sentiments and socio-religious beliefs.
India is a country with unity in diversity. There is opposition to same-sex marriages in almost all religions and sects. Recently, such clear voices have been heard in the Sikh community. Akal Takht Jathedar Giani Raghbir Singh said that there is no place for same-sex marriages under Sikh principles. The Akal Takht has disqualified the priests from conducting religious services at the Bathinda Gurudwara after conducting same-sex marriages last month. The decision was announced by Jathedar of the Akal Takht, the highest secular body of the Sikhs, after a meeting of the ‘Panj Singh Sahiban’ (five Sikh clergy) in Amritsar a day before the Supreme Court announced its verdict.
The Supreme Court declared same-sex a non-criminal act in 2018 itself, and inspired by this, many pro-gay organisations filed petitions before the Supreme Court to legalise their marriages, which were opposed by the Central Government. How can the marriage of gays and lesbians be considered perfect? It may not be a marriage; it may be a mutual relationship, but how can it be given the recognition and all the rights of natural marriages? Therefore, considering the social structure of India, if the Central Government opposes the recognition of gay and lesbian marriages, then it cannot be held wrong in any way. Even though such examples have been found in ancient times in India itself or there are many such examples mentioned in religious texts that point towards homosexual relationships, Indian society has always considered such relationships to be sexual, against nature and against social norms, placing them in the category of sexual disorder. The sexual relationship between man and woman keeps nature dynamic. The meaning of home and family is the broader form of the results arising from the relationship between man and woman. The relationship between man and woman is the great journey of love, and the child born from a sexual relationship between these two is the basis for taking the family and lineage forward.
Man-woman relationships are not dependent on any religious belief; rather, they are a person’s own scientific need. For new creations, the union of opposite sexes is natural; otherwise, it is distortion. We cannot corrupt our culture and tradition in the name of blind imitation of the West. Even though times are changing, there are radical changes in traditions, and new definitions of human relationships are being created. In India, too, two adult men and women live together without marriage in the form of a live-in relationship. Therefore, if two people of the same sex want to live together, then society can allow it by respecting their privacy, and their civil rights can also be protected. But as far as the Special Marriage Act is concerned, it can happen only between two people of opposite sexes. Amending it would mean changing the conditions of marriage as well as destroying the concept of family.